During my Practicum Experience, I observed little guidance from nurses to explore the legitimate, administrative, repayment, and moral issues that can emerge while offering medical assistance employing innovation. While there are legal and moral rules for these issues that cover the overall act of healthcare, unprecedented challenges arise when telehealth advances become associated with the arrangement of these administrations (Watzlaf et al., 2017). For instance, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), a government law that, in addition to other things, builds up lawful rules for the privacy and confidentiality of clinical records (Dart et al., 2016). They set explicit norms for the capacity and transmission of electronically ensured wellbeing data.
During the COVID-19 crisis, the hospital where I worked had to practice telehealth through different platforms which were not secured for a personal information breach. Thus, considering the case, the authorities gave notification of implementing carefulness. They expressed that it will not force punishments for infringement during the arrangement of telehealth during the pandemic (Shachar et al., 2020). This permitted clinicians and medical services substances to utilize stages that are not privacy consistent, for example, Facetime and other popular channels (Shachar et al., 2020). This functional methodology was expected to increment telehealth benefits rapidly; however, it requires cautious thought of the drawn-out issues with these stages.
Confidentiality concerns ought not to hinder the genuine need of patients to get care on a reasonable premise. Patient privacy guidelines have been seen as a common boundary to a more extensive reception of telehealth. Nurses who give telehealth administrations find sensible ways to guarantee that safety efforts are set up to protect data from accidental access (Dart et al., 2016). A way to deal with confidentiality might work if the system is as simple as financial procedures.
The Healthcare Technologies Issue in Nursing
Advances in data and correspondence advances have prompted the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT). In the cutting-edge medical care climate, the utilization of IoT advances brings the accommodation of doctors and patients since they are applied to different clinical regions (Jaiswal & Anand, 2020). Resource following through electronic wellbeing records can be both a gift and a revile (Pinto et al., 2018). Clinical specialists can utilize it to discover anything with a standardized identification or following chip. Nonetheless, ineffectively planned frameworks frequently hinder nurses’ work, making them captive to their Electronic Health Records (EHR).
The issue exists in the electronic well-being records themselves. Specialists planned the framework to work with charging, not on tolerant consideration; nonetheless, it ought to have the option to do both. While EHRs are not avoidable, doctors can decrease the strain and shoot at innovation burnout by partaking in preparation presented by suppliers (Visser et al., 2018). For clinical experts, there are two potential blueprints to keep away from an interface issue. In my experience, the clinic’s managers tried to engage with manufacturers during the research and development phase and let them know what was needed. However, the communication between the providers and nursing staff was troublesome, and it took months to get a response.
Healthcare gadgets may change the world; however, they will not make any difference if they are too hard even to consider utilizing. Nobody will utilize it if there is an excess of information on the screen on the double or the interface does not assist clients with exploring. The way to facilitate the utilization of medical services innovation is to give some instruction to suppliers because occasionally, we get sidetracked and do not understand that we submitted a break. It is crucial to make instruments that are not difficult to utilize, then, at that point, consolidate them into the doctor’s work process.
Dart, E. H., Whipple, H. M., Pasqua, J. L., & Furlow, C. M. (2016). Legal, regulatory, and ethical issues in Telehealth Technology. Computer-Assisted and Web-Based Innovations in Psychology, Special Education, and Health, 339–363. Web.
Jaiswal, K., & Anand, V. (2020). A survey on IOT-based healthcare system: Potential Applications, issues, and challenges. Advances in Biomedical Engineering and Technology, 459–471. Web.
Pinto, S., Caldeira, S., Marques, G., & da Conceição, A. P. (2018). Healthcare Technologies: An ethical discussion. British Journal of Healthcare Management, 24(2), 65–70. Web.
Shachar, C., Engel, J., & Elwyn, G. (2020). Implications for telehealth in a post-pandemic future. Journal of the American Medical Association, 323(23), 2375–2376. Web.
Visser, L. M., Benschop, Y. W. M., Bleijenbergh, I. L., & van Riel, A. C. R. (2018). Unequal consumers: Consumerist healthcare technologies and their creation of new inequalities. Organization Studies, 40(7), 1025–1044. Web.
Watzlaf, V. J. M., Zhou, L., DeAlmeida, D. R., & Hartman, L. M. (2017). A systematic review of research studies examining telehealth privacy and security practices used by healthcare providers. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 9(2), 39–58. Web.