Sam Water and Brittany Maynard Analysis

Topic: Public Health
Words: 683 Pages: 2

Sam Water and Brittany Maynard were two people whose terminal illnesses and decisions regarding their end-of-life care garnered news. Sam Water, a British actor and director, is well-known for his work in “Lawrence of Arabia” and “The Lion in Winter,” among other movies. He received a prostate cancer diagnosis in 2009 and passed away in 2014. In 2014, a young American woman named Brittany Maynard received the devastating news that she had a brain tumor. To lawfully seek medical help in dying, she relocated to Oregon, where she eventually passed away in 2014.

In these situations, the proper function of medicine is to treat pain and offer comfort care. While doctors should work to extend and treat ailments, there comes a time when vigorous therapy might be harmful. Medical personnel should respect patients’ desires for end-of-life care and strive to make them as easy as possible when treating dying patients. When permissible, this strategy may also encompass medical treatment, home care, and medical assistance in dying. It is not for anybody else to judge when someone with a terminal illness loses their dignity. It is incorrect to imply that someone loses their sense of worth at a particular stage of a terminal illness. Regardless of one’s physical or mental condition, every person has the intrinsic right to dignity. Each person has a threshold because satisfaction is subjective and individualized when they believe their dignity has been violated. Even though dealing with a terminal disease can be complicated, it is up to the patient to decide whatever they need to do to keep their dignity.

Suffering can have dignity because it allows people to show how resilient they are in tough times. By enduring the experience, people can uphold their pride in the face of the pain and challenges that come with suffering. Suffering might entail continuing to live with purpose and meaning despite hardship and remaining cheerful and upbeat. This suffering does not imply that people should be made to endure gratuitous suffering. It is crucial to control pain and symptoms to maintain the highest possible level of a person’s quality of life. It’s debatable if suicide can be done with dignity. While some contend that abortion is a personal decision that should be honored, others argue that it violates the pride of life. Ultimately, deciding to terminate one’s life is a personal choice that should not be criticized.

Whether or not doctors assist in suicide is moral, depending on the situation. Let’s say someone has a fatal illness, has decided on the conscious choice to terminate their life, and their jurisdiction permits medical aid in dying. It may be claimed that doing so is a compassionate decision. The necessary protections must be in place to guarantee that the choices are voluntary and informed and that the person is not under duress or influence.

There are differing perspectives on medically assisted suicide. Some people think it’s a kind and humane method to end the misery. Some contend that it violates life’s worth and the fundamental tenets of medicine. In my view, there are instances where physician-assisted suicide is moral. For example, if a person is going through excruciating pain that can’t be relieved any other way. Doctor death can be a compassionate option to terminate a patient’s suffering if the victim seems mentally sound and has made a well-informed choice. When all other hospice care alternatives have been tried, they must be used as a last resort.

Finally, it should be noted that final care is a complex topic that calls for a careful approach. Medical practitioners must put the patient’s well-being and ease of life first and honor their requests for end-of-life care. Even if dignity is a very individualized and subjective concept, it is crucial to make every effort to uphold it. Terminating one’s life is ultimately very private, and it’s not up to others to judge. It is the role of society to decide whether or not providing hospice care is a moral option and to put policies in place to guarantee that such a choice is freely and well-informed.