Healthcare is a broad segment of ministry in the U.S. Other countries also value the department of health because the future of every nation leans on the quality of health care services provided. Pesut et al. (2019) hold that the measures used to compare the safety and quality of health dictate the efficacy of nurses and other medical practitioners. The equity of hospitality care is a critical sector in determining an organizational success in offering safety measures to its clients. Moreover, timeliness, patient-centered care, and efficiency of health care centers describe the quality of nursing practices. The respect for populations and patients in a given geographical location guides medical researchers in understanding the background problems to quality care and patient safety. U.S healthcare department incorporates three sets of measurements to compare the quality of services offered in various healthcare organizations. Outcomes measures within pharmaceuticals and clinics help the ministry of health measure the quality of professional nursing practices. Secondly, the nation adopts the balancing measures in financial sectors to know whether organizations focus on the profitability of the safety of patients. Process measures, on the other end, link companies to patient-nurse engagements.
Health Care Regulation and Professional Nursing Practice
Health care is a sensitive department worldwide that demands the government’s oversight of the undertaken operations. The U.S health agencies, for instance, empower nurses and other medical practitioners on the significance of primary regulations in the ministry of health. The public well-being of the people is protected through healthcare regulations. Department of Health and Human Service (HHS) and the congressional health agency of the U.S preserve the health of its citizens through the creation of laws. The improvement of further medical research and public health issues is achievable with state regulations on nursing. The Healthcare Quality Improvement Act (1986) is an example of a healthcare regulation in the U.S that provides medical immunity for stakeholders in the profession. The acts have evolved since its legalization. Currently, professionals in the medical field are protected from peer-review lawsuits; nurses are allowed to file cases against dangerous and unprofessional peer conduct in the workspace, courtesy of the healthcare quality improvement act (Curtis et al., 2019). Medicaid and Medicare are also the existing regulatory laws that ensure U.S citizens enjoy quality patient care.
Similarly, the professional nursing practice provides healthcare experts with regulations that monitor clinical workspaces. Curtis et al. (2019) suggest that professional nursing practice involves the partnerships of other practitioners in the medical field with nurses in providing quality and adequate patient care. Besides, the ability of clinical officers and nurses to manage several complex tasks within a health care setup incorporates the concepts of professional nursing practices. Nurses are expected to show empathy to sick people admitted to their clinics or hospitals as a caring profession. Although the role-modeling and caring expectations of nursing are challenging, the curriculum of showing strong connections to patients is a key practice required in work. According to Smith & Plunkett (2018), patient care is best demonstrated by the ability of nurses to possess certain values of professionalism. Health care regulations are strongly connected to professional nursing practice, which values human dignity, integrity, social justice, autonomy, and altruism.
The government has been training nurses to attain social justice in their work environments. Such actions have resulted in the promotion of positive nurse-patient engagement. First, the U.S Department of Health and Human Service is training nurses to advocate for the patients’ rights to help the state promote and support professional nursing practices in the country (Smith & Plunkett, 2018). The nursing profession is regulated with pertinent nursing values; nurses are responsible for providing compassionate and efficient medical care to admitted clients. Including a nurse’s role, such professionals must be guided by nursing practices prioritizing social justice. Furthermore, the professional nursing practice puts assistant clinical officers in positions of meeting integrity. The connections between healthcare regulations and nursing values protect nurses from being untrue to their beliefs. Nursing practices also facilitate health care professions to follow their moral compass. Sticking to truth and selfless qualities makes the job reliant on regulation.
Human dignity and autonomy are also key professional nursing practice values that guide health care experts in associating with patients and their families. Allowing patients to talk about themselves, their medical history, and experiences in any nursing home showcases the significance of professional nursing practices in contemporary society. Secondly, the dedication of personal time to clients also helps patients recover; thus, nursing practices utilize the core value of human dignity to connect with patients. Patients’ rights can also be understood with the knowledge of the professional nursing practice. Curtis et al. (2019) commend nurses for mastering nursing practice concepts, especially the autonomy part, to have a good flow of jobs in their occupation. Autonomy sharpens nurses’ communication with clients and with administrative staff. The nursing value clears communication through the enhanced freedom of acting on nursing roles and responsibilities.
Collaboration of Interdisciplinary Healthcare Teams
Improving the delivery of safe care to sick people requires nurses and other medical practitioners to incorporate the approach of healthcare collaboration and inter-disciplinary teams. Healthcare management resembles different organizational roles and responsibilities; however, professionalism is highly recommended in cases of nursing practice (Morley & Cashell, 2017). Interdisciplinary relations and workplace collaborations involve the outsourcing of knowledge from various departments in healthcare settings. Different organizations have varying frameworks and models that ensure the effective collaboration of nursing services. The ability of inter-disciplinary teams to improve the quality of healthcare makes the approach of management a clinical consideration to patient care (Curtis et al., 2019). When physicians, occupational therapists, nurses, doctors, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals work as a team, patient care outcomes improve. The coming together of more than one medical expert in promoting healthcare quality commemorates the concepts of collaboration and interdisciplinary teams.
Collaboration of healthcare professionals has great potential benefits for patients. The involved parties in such interdisciplinary teams also impact the work experience and skills of nurses, pharmacists, and therapists in clinical settings. Nevertheless, patient safety is the key objective behind formulating professional teams in healthcare. First, collaboration in healthcare ensures the achievability of quality of care among patients. According to Rousseau et al. (2017), research on the impacts of inter-disciplinary cooperation in medical environments prioritizes the quality of care issued to patients. If medical specialists and nurses can monitor a patient from different departments and workspaces, the quality of care given to such individuals seems higher than those treated and supervised solely by nurses. Families trust clinics with their patients; therefore, inter-disciplinary teams work together to meet the expectations of their clients. For example, the quality assurance team at the American Association of Physicists (AAP) engaged the Radiation Therapy Committee (RTC) as an interdisciplinary team to achieve the quality of health through technology (Rousseau et al., 2017). Learning is continuous in surroundings ruled and controlled by organizational cultures steered by collaboration.
Furthermore, the collaborative practice in healthcare results in patient engagement benefits always. The art of medicine affects team behaviors; alternative management models are required to boost patient-nurse concentrations. Inter-disciplinary action teams are one such solution to the poor bonding between patients and nurses (Morley & Cashell, 2017). Even though nursing is a lucrative job, the occupational hazards linked to the occupation frustrate the attitudes of the registered members. However, the adoption of inter-disciplinary collaborations frameworks in stressful environments changes the behaviors of nurses alongside other professionals toward patients. The inadequate connections observed in public hospitals have been reduced through the technique because collaboration promotes the engagement of patients (Morley & Cashell, 2017). The cause-and-effect relationships in nursing practice are difficult to isolate; nevertheless, the implementation of collaborative teams helps physicians understand the relationships between patients and doctors. Health care experts with different professional skills, experience, and roles can create responsive, considerate, and efficient workforce practices; thus, projecting the patient engagement abilities with medics can develop only with the consideration of collaborative teams.
Although interdisciplinary team collaborations promote patient safety and staff benefits, the approach of nursing practice has several limitations. Professional regulation practices, schemes of compensation, and institutional policies include some of the barriers to collaboration in nursing. In addition, physical and environmental factors beyond nurses’ control also affect the successful implementation of cooperation in health care. Workplace collaboration not only affect social organizations, health care also leans on the policies of inter-disciplinary teams. The overall outlook of organizations providing quality health implement collaborative frameworks. The safety of patients relies on the successful implementation of clinical approaches that prioritizes collaboration of teams at workplaces.
Curtis, E., Jones, R., Tipene-Leach, D., Walker, C., Loring, B., Paine, S. J., & Reid, P. (2019). Why cultural safety rather than cultural competency is required to achieve health equity: A literature review and recommended definition. International Journal for Equity in Health, 18(1), 1-17. Web.
Morley, L., & Cashell, A. (2017). Collaboration in health care. Journal Of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 48(2), 207-216. Web.
Pesut, B., Thorne, S., Stager, M. L., Schiller, C. J., Penney, C., Hoffman, C., & Roussel, J. (2019). Medical assistance in dying: A review of Canadian nursing regulatory documents. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 20(3), 113-130. Web.
Rousseau, C., Pontbriand, A., Nadeau, L., & Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2017). Perception of interprofessional collaboration and co-location of specialists and primary care teams in youth mental health. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26(3), 198.
Smith, A. F., & Plunkett, E. (2018). People, systems, and safety: Resilience and excellence in healthcare practice. Anaesthesia, 74(4), 508-517. Web.