Nursing Theory, Practice, and Research Concepts

Topic: Nursing
Words: 1114 Pages: 3

The following concepts can be used to describe the link between theory, practice, and research. Based on a focus on the parts that evidence-based practices are accommodated by Medicaid Services’ viewpoints, the major goal is to improve the value-based patient care system. This proponent of analysis believes that when practicing, it is necessary to conduct the study (Rosa et al., 2019). Eventually, it improves their practice and patient care. The capacity to comprehend and successfully apply the theory and evidence one learns to support it determines a nurse’s average overall survival coefficient. To construct enduring solutions, it also relies on a force of mass study, which accompanies knowledge even as professional work. This is something that the connection promotes.

A logical application to answer specific research questions or test ideas utilizing a well-trained, holistic method is what the researcher thinks of. Analysts must apply a rational approach to methodical, consistent planning for the study outcomes to be considered dependable and substantial. To address those issues, the initial element of the inquiry entails a methodical, comprehensive review of the literature (Shoghi et al., 2019). The identified information spaces serve as a springboard for developing a specific research question, hypothesis, or both. Following that, a basic concept can be chosen to lead the inquiry and aid in selecting the type of method that will be utilized to investigate the phenomenon. Although integrated methods combining both are advanced, there are two main approaches quantitative (numerical) and independent procedures.

Participating in human-based research activities might be a risky move, especially if the study involves invasive experiments. Subjects can be requested to participate in nonprofit research that isn’t too risky or in a study with a large profit potential but is exceedingly risky. Subjects may be exposed to great danger in placebo-controlled experiments with little benefit to the individual (Saunders et al., 2019). Therapeutic approaches that compare the outcome of an investigative arm with a level of care further blur the distinction between study and treatment and confuse these factors. The government tasks institutional review boards with reviewing human-subjects research to ensure that the compliance policy fulfills relevant ethical requirements before studies are enrolled. The path that led to today’s laws and ethical issues was lengthy and winding. Misconduct and significant bad occurrences are less likely as the system evolves.

Typically, much of the information found online is not accredited, which may spread misinformation to the people. However, this assignment is related to the practice of nursing. The information used herein evaluates the different propositions without bias (Rosa et al., 2019). This is because of the following reasons the types of data used are an evidence-based form of data able to cite sources and references peer-reviewed. Besides, it includes relevant information that is quite recent regarding the topic.

WHO was able to conduct a meeting intended to synthesize, retrieve, and assess evidence on complex health interventions in August 2016. A second meeting to crosscheck the draft foundation papers was later-held. While the last survey that the WHO also conducted in Geneva around July of 2017 was carried out, the above is proof of the continuous efforts to create, build, evaluate, and detail the proof base societal. The conduct and the commitment to the network in decisions are meant for maternal and infant well-being (Saunders et al., 2019). As a result, several papers were developed to assess the topics. The WHO Steering Group come together to give out a contribution to the draft papers. Later from the gathering, these papers were changed, arranged, and adjusted to accommodate a type of survey to be carried out. To find out more about the developments in practice, these papers will be brought before the global evidence summit that shall happen sometime in the year.

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) program for Health Care (EHC) supports individual researchers, research institutes, and educational institutions to partner with AHRQ to produce effective and comparable medical research for consumers and consumers. CERL-related interventions focus on the benefits, harms, adequacy of lifelong denial mediation, analysis, treatment, management of clinical conditions, and improving the delivery of social insurance (Shoghi et al., 2019). The motive of CER is to help patients and clients, physicians, and various providers make informed choices that will improve medical services at both levels and for local people.

One purpose of the EHC is to make CER open to decision-makers. A specific theme was recorded between the main quartile of points for the main interest rate of the introduction. Many expect that better communication with the spread of CER will lead to using such a data board. This is how the EHC Stakeholder Group’s Specific Committee of Uncertainty has been involved in proposing effective ways to transfer risks regarding welfare and proof of social insurance to end customers (Gorsuch et al., 2020). The Board may seek to understand what mechanisms to deal with and transfer risks have improved the likelihood that groups of viewers receiving that data can understand and account for their decision-making.

Quality Measures of safety are developed and validated in various ways. These are the procedures from which several standard practices are adopted. These practices eventually prevent harm, negative outcomes arising from negligence, or cases of mortality and morbidity. Therefore, nurses must be critical to the surveillance of how these outcomes are controlled. They are developed through observable and standardized medical procedures over time (Shoghi et al., 2019). Parties practicing in the field over a considerable amount of time validate them through adoption. Nurses lead quality and safety in health care by carrying out ongoing monitoring and assessment evaluations for patients. Addressing complications as soon as they arise, controlling care delivery by other providers, and educating patients about safety issues.

The obliging skill is one a nurse chooses to oblige as a conflict resolution strategy. One should try to avoid indulgence in situations that can cause conflict. This avoidance is an approach modality where the aim is to be able to reach a solution where both sides feel happy (Gorsuch et al., 2020). Collaboration is a strategy where you incorporate another person’s idea to be your own. Therefore, a change in attitude is everything, and people must be taught interpersonal communication skills.

Inconclusively, research and theory provide guidance to the nursing practice. The research conducted needs to adhere to principles of medical ethics such as autonomy and informed consent before the subjects can participate in it. Additionally, the research should use credible sources which will provide quality information to enable the nurse to integrate their skills during patient care. Generally, excellent research that builds on the theory facilitates good nursing practice, which consequently leads to proper care of the patient.


Gorsuch, C. R. P. F., Gallagher Ford, L., Koshy Thomas, B., Melnyk, B. M., & Connor, L. (2020). Impact of a formal educational skill‐building program based on the ARCC Model to enhance evidence‐based practice competency in nurse teams. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 17(4), 258-268. Web.

Rosa, W. E., Upvall, M. J., Beck, D. M., & Dossey, B. M. (2019). Nursing and sustainable development: Furthering the global agenda in uncertain times. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 24(2). Web.

Saunders, H., Gallagher‐Ford, L., Kvist, T., & Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, K. (2019). Practicing healthcare professionals’ evidence‐based practice competencies: An overview of systematic reviews. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 16(3), 176-185. Web.

Shoghi, M., Sajadi, M., Oskuie, F., Dehnad, A., & Borimnejad, L. (2019). Strategies for bridging the theory-practice gap from the perspective of nursing experts. Heliyon, 5(9), e02503. Web.

Stanford Nurses Labor-Management Negotiation
Job Satisfaction and Tasks of Saudi Nurses